Tuckerman Purity Test

[DMC]

And speaking of stipid internet tests:
M@'s Tuckerman Purity Test (http://www.weirdtable.org/~m/tuckerman/purity/)

M@
109.... what do I win!!!???!?!!?

AND DON'T SAY A COWBELL!!!!! ;)

[Jolly J]

100 on the button on the tux test

[cliffhuxtable]

And speaking of stipid internet tests:
M@'s Tuckerman Purity Test (http://www.weirdtable.org/~m/tuckerman/purity/)

M@


Hmmm, 56...DMC: you must have done the nasty in a leanteh.

[M@]

I got a 101.

Camping up there gets you lots of points.

M@

[el-bagr]

v0.5=107. Primarily camping.

Then I thought about it some more and got a 117. Under v0.5, the answers are cumulative:

The Basics
Answer these "Have you ever been to Tuckerman Ravine ...?" questions
At least once
More than 5 times (3pt)
More then 10 times (5pt)
Alone (5pt)

Determination
Answer these "Have you ever driven more than ... to get to Tuckerman Ravine?" questions
1 hr
3 hrs (2pt)
6 hrs (3pt)
8 hrs (4pt)

So if you've been more than 10 times, and have been alone, and you check off all the lesser choices, you get 14 points... and if you've driven at least 8 hours, you've also driven at least 1, 3, and 6 hours... so you get 10 points.

Maybe radio buttons instead of checkboxes, unless this is a design objective (i.e. awarding bonus points for the exercise of cunning skill)?

[M@]

Maybe radio buttons instead of checkboxes, unless this is a design objective (i.e. awarding bonus points for the exercise of cunning skill)?
It's a feature.

M@

[DMC]

It's a feature.

M@
chortle.....chortle.....chortle.....

That was funny...

[RR]

Score 109 (No accumulatives, just straight up)
Tux v0.5= (note the version when quoting your score)
Please send feedback to TimeForTuckerman Board
You are visitor no. 306

Several fun things yet to try......

[Castlerock]

El-Bagr. I matched you! 117. I've been doing this too long. FWIW, M@, some how the addition doesn't work with Firefox 9.3

[M@]

FWIW, M@, some how the addition doesn't work with Firefox 9.3
That also being a feature - it acts the same with the "Evil Test" - and if anyone has the answer I will remove that feature.

M@

[NtrentT]

44 for me,, I only decided to take interest in the ravine last july.

So im getting there :-)

:schlitz:

[cliffhuxtable]

I got a 101.

Camping up there gets you lots of points.

M@

I only see 3pts for an overnighter, but if you have a spacious leanteh or tent + a significant other....well then the pts can roll. But what if your special friend don't like that sorta thing. Should that be held against you? Hmmmm, maybe so. I suppose the whole system is a mark of "idealism".

[RR]

cliffhuxtable, don't let it get you down...

nice avatar btw....

[Affix Snow]

I got a 64...

Whoopi...Goldberg?

[el-bagr]

8s, based on my calculations I suspect you have made a naked run. The rumors are true, Naked Guy is among us.

:disinfo:

292 total points possible...

[M@]

Mmmm.... I got 197 for the Tuckerman Purity Test (v0.5)
I think that might be the high score for this board.

You get a cowbell.

M@

[Tommy T]

Hmmm....

I think I'll wait for the next version before posting the pathetic number I got for my 53 trips.

No extra points for trips beyond 10, no points for bivis in the woods, no points for trail work on an access route, no points for SAR volunteering, no points for being there on Thanksgiving, Xmas or New Years Day, no points for getting a daughter into the ravine at 18 months or hiking it at 6 or for getting a son ice climbing on the ice fall at 6, no bonus for old age, no points for summit-to-Pink non-stops.

Seems like v 0.5 rewards lewd behavior above alpinism. Maybe M@ can do better on his next try.

Tommy T.

[NtrentT]

Hmmm....

I think I'll wait for the next version before posting the pathetic number I got for my 53 trips.

No extra points for trips beyond 10, no points for bivis in the woods, no points for trail work on an access route, no points for SAR volunteering, no points for being there on Thanksgiving, Xmas or New Years Day, no points for getting a daughter into the ravine at 18 months or hiking it at 6 or for getting a son ice climbing on the ice fall at 6, no bonus for old age, no points for summit-to-Pink non-stops.

Seems like v 0.5 rewards lewd behavior above alpinism. Maybe M@ can do better on his next try.

Tommy T.



HOLY :badwords:

[M@]

No extra points for trips beyond 10, no points for bivis in the woods, no points for trail work on an access route, no points for SAR volunteering, no points for being there on Thanksgiving, Xmas or New Years Day, no points for getting a daughter into the ravine at 18 months or hiking it at 6 or for getting a son ice climbing on the ice fall at 6, no bonus for old age, no points for summit-to-Pink non-stops.

That also, is a feature.
M@

[Skilasnow]

Tommt T rules! and an attorney at that ;) .

Yup!..... Not just once either! 4 times total to date..... twice on my birthdate (May 28th) and once in June with a girlfriend (Alison - she skied naked too!).... we had a group of buddies from PSC(now PSU) carry our clothes down and the last in early May

Pos rep for doing it, neg rep for not carrying your own clothes :D

I got an 80... but on the cummulative things I only said what I'd done, ie. I have travelled more than three hours, but not more than two exepting that thou then consider three, five is right out!

[M@]

I have travelled more than three hours, but not more than two exepting that thou then consider three, five is right out!
Skip a bit brother.

M@